New mathematical methods used to carry out fisheries stock assessments could help provide more reliable reviews to support decision-making, says Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke).

Ms Pulkkinen says using Bayesian statistical models can help improve fisheries stock assessments. Photo: Jaakko Huikari

Ms Pulkkinen says using Bayesian statistical models can help improve fisheries stock assessments. Photo: Jaakko Huikari

While fisheries stock assessments can give a general status overview, no direct information on fish stock size or fishing mortality rates is available, and any conclusions are based on indirect information and the combination of various information sources.

But, Henni Pulkkinen, Researcher at the Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), says using Bayesian statistical models, which enable extensive combining of information, can help. For example, biological and ecological data on related species can be used in the assessment of many endangered and data poor fish stocks, she says.

“Bayesian modelling represents a learning process where existing information is updated with new information. The challenge lies in identifying the wide variety of sources containing useful information,” said Ms Pulkkinen. “Such information can be obtained from literature or databases, but it can also be so-called tacit knowledge collected through expert interviews.”

While traditional fisheries stocks assessment models are largely designed based on observed data, sufficient attention is not paid to the uncertainties underlying the resulting assumptions. Bayesian modelling is said to enable the description of the whole biological process even if the amount of data available is small, making it easier to identify the least known elements and take into account any uncertainties related to them.

In her doctoral thesis, Ms Pulkkinen also discusses model uncertainty (structural uncertainty), which results from the fact that the phenomenon being researched can be explained with several – even contradicting – theories.

“There is not a single mathematical function representing a natural phenomenon that is absolutely correct. However, a combination of several different, even competing views on the best mathematical model can provide a more extensive understanding of a phenomenon than any of them alone,” added Ms Pulkkinen.

One of the success stories related to Bayesian modelling is the Baltic salmon stock assessment model, which combines biological background knowledge with extensive research data of the wild salmon stocks in Finland and Sweden.

The International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES) uses fisheries stock assessment data in its annual scientific advice concerning the fishing quotas for the Baltic salmon.

According to Ms Pulkkinen, the use of Bayesian statistical models is increasing in population biology. However, modelling requires understanding of probability calculus, and the in the practical implementation of the models computational challenges need to be tackled.

Despite these challenges, Bayesian models have become a daily tool in numerous fields. “The model choice can have a significant effect on the interpretation of data,” Ms Pulkkinen concluded.