Governments at a United Nations meeting on wildlife trade yesterday voted against better international trade controls for five shark species, which are in severe decline because of overfishing for their high-value fins and meat.
The Convention on International Trade and Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) governments voted against proposals to list three hammerhead sharks (Scalloped, Great and Smooth), the Oceanic Whitetip and the Spiny Dogfish in Appendix II of the Convention, which would enforce better management of the fisheries for international commercial trade and allow their declining populations to recover.
However, governments did vote to include the Porbeagle Shark – overfished primarily for its meat and fins – in Appendix II.
“Once again CITES has failed to listen to the scientists. The decision not to list all of these sharks is a conservation catastrophe for these species,” said Glenn Sant, Global Marine Programme Co-ordinator for TRAFFIC.
“Populations of these sharks have declined by more than 90% in some areas, many of them caught illegally and destined to end up in the shark-fin trade. They are targeted because of their high value.”
“The current level of trade in these species is simply not sustainable.”
The rejection of three of the four sharks proposals follows the failure of other marine proposals at CITES last week to introduce stronger trade restrictions for Red and Pink corals, and an outright ban on the international commercial trade of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna – both despite overwhelming scientific evidence that additional protection for these species is needed, says TRAFFIC.
