Seafood spoilage could be reduced by irradiation
About one third of all fish landed spoils before it can be consumed. So, it would be thought that any process which can destroy the microorganisms that cause fish and shellfish to spoil would be welcomed with open arms.
However, this has not been the case with irradiation which, although approved for use with a variety of foods in many countries, is still very limited in terms of treating seafood.
In Europe there is a radiation facility in Belgium which treats shrimp and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the irradiation of shrimp and prawns, as well as crab, lobster and crayfish, to control food-borne pathogens and extend shelf-life.
Irradiation is the physical treatment of food with high-energy ionizing radiation. Usually this takes the form of gamma rays produced by the radioisotope cobalt 60. It is a cold process so there is virtually no alteration in the form of the food after treatment has been carried out.
During irradiation, the energy waves affect unwanted microorganisms but are not retained in the food being treated. Scientists say there is no nutrient loss at least when compared with a process such as canning.
European Commission (EC) is at pains to point out that irradiation does not
The EC also states that irradiated food, or food products containing irradiated ingredients, must be labelled as such.
The FDA requires that both the logo and statement ‘Treated with irradiation’ or ‘Treated by irradiation’ appear on packaged foods, bulk containers of unpackaged foods, on placards at the point of purchase (for fresh produce), and on invoices for irradiated ingredients and products sold to food processors.
The labelling of irradiated foods, or lack of it, is another bone of contention for opponents of the treatment. Some groups argue that the radura does not accurately reflect the treatment that has been carried out.
There has long been a powerful, vocal and largely successful campaign by consumer groups and others against food irradiation. A number of concerns have been raised about the process, but the main reason for opposition to it may be an emotional one. The word ‘radiation’ is seen as threatening because of its associations with nuclear weapons and disasters like Chernobyl.
Surveys show that consumers’ views could be changed if they were provided with accurate information about the benefits and given an opportunity to try irradiated products.
This is unlikely to happen, at least in Europe where most large supermarket chains consider there is so much consumer resistance to irradiated foods and so little demand that there is no point in developing the technology.
LATEST PRESS RELEASES
Actions for investment and financing opportunities together with the day to day practicalities of ru... Read more
Lilja Alfreðsdóttir, the Minister of Education, Science and Culture in Iceland announced the winners... Read more
February 2018 Fareham UK - Mercator Media Ltd, the international, market-leading B2B marine media bu... Read more