{"id":4994,"date":"2013-02-11T12:48:00","date_gmt":"2013-02-11T12:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/worldfishing.nfdtesting.uk\/icefish-conference\/2013\/02\/11\/greenpeace-nffo-forced-into-embarrassing-climb-down\/"},"modified":"2013-02-11T12:48:00","modified_gmt":"2013-02-11T12:48:00","slug":"greenpeace-nffo-forced-into-embarrassing-climb-down","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/icefish-conference\/news\/industry-news\/greenpeace-nffo-forced-into-embarrassing-climb-down\/","title":{"rendered":"Greenpeace: NFFO forced into \u2018embarrassing climb-down\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The report into the<strong> <\/strong>National Federation of Fishermen\u2019s Organisations (NFFO) stated that the organisation is not what it claims to be &#8211; and the NFFO soon came back with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/news101\/industry-news\/nffo-names-10-flaws-in-greenpeace-research\" target=\"_blank\">10 flaws<\/a> in the Greenpeace report.<\/p>\n<p>Greenpeace has since said that the NFFO has been forced into an embarrassing climb-down over the size of its membership following the investigation.<\/p>\n<p>In the report, Greenpeace revealed that the NFFO claimed to represent a number of fishing associations which turned out to be either defunct or not members. After acknowledging that it had published &#8216;incorrect information&#8217;, as of last week, the NFFO\u2019s website was only showing three of the original 20 fishermen\u2019s associations listed as members.<\/p>\n<p>Greenpeace has described the move as the \u2018first major dent\u2019 in the federation\u2019s carefully nurtured image as the all-embracing representative of the fishing industry, and is urging the NFFO to finally set the record straight by publishing a full list of its member vessels.<\/p>\n<p>Greenpeace has also published a list of the findings which it says that the federation has failed to address and the questions it left unanswered:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b>The 8% fig leaf:<\/b> The NFFO hides behind a fig leaf when it insists that only 8% of their member vessels are foreign-controlled \u2013 a figure which Greenpeace says actually validates its findings. It says that the NFFO is keeping quiet about is that the 42 vessels making up this 8% are some of the largest boats in the UK fleet and control over half (57%) of the fishing capacity represented by the NFFO. Greenpeace has asked why the federation is so reluctant to accept this figure &#8211; is it because it suggests that foreign-controlled boats account for a large chunk of the fishing quota held by the NFFO fleet, as well as for a big slice of the federation\u2019s revenues from membership fees?<\/li>\n<li><b>Out of date:<\/b> The NFFO claims that some fishermen\u2019s associations were wrongly listed as members simply because of a failure to keep their website up to date. But Greenpeace is suggesting that this may have been more than an oversight and is asking if the revisions will be permanent.<\/li>\n<li><b>Hogging the stage:<\/b> On the issue of representation for the under-10s, the NFFO maintains that it is &#8216;against a separate advisory council for small scale fleets&#8217;, but Greenpeace claims that in its letter to the European Commission, the federation\u2019s chief also opposed proposals to allow other organisations representing the UK small-scale sector onto existing Regional Advisory Councils, suggesting that the Commission should instead help the NFFO recruit more members among the under-10s. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Greenpeace\u2019s recent report \u2018Wolf in Shrimp\u2019s Clothing\u2019 has caused quite a stir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-4994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-industry-news"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/icefish-conference\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/icefish-conference\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/icefish-conference\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/icefish-conference\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/icefish-conference\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/icefish-conference\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4994\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/icefish-conference\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/icefish-conference\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/icefish-conference\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4994"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldfishing.net\/icefish-conference\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=4994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}